Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLSX vs ONCFX
FHLSX vs ONCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHLSX vs ONCFX
Fidelity Health Savings
Price$10.98
Change-$0.04 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.3M
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth I
Price$13.27
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.14B
FHLSX vs ONCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLSX vs. ONCFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLSX is a Hold and ONCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONCFX has more cash in the bank: 4.14B vs. FHLSX (65.3M). ONCFX pays higher dividends than FHLSX: ONCFX (3.46) vs FHLSX (2.61). FHLSX was incepted earlier than ONCFX: FHLSX (6 years) vs ONCFX (29 years). ONCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FHLSX (0.49). FHLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ONCFX (8.00). FHLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONCFX: FHLSX (0) vs ONCFX (1000000). FHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. ONCFX (5.51). FHLSX return over 5 years is better than : 19.96 vs. ONCFX (17.25).
| FHLSX | ONCFX | FHLSX / ONCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.69 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.69 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.611 | 8.918 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000000 | - |
| Net Assets | 65.3M | 4.14B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 3.46 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 5.51 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.62 | 25.81 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.96 | 17.25 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement