Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLSX vs ONCFX
FHLSX vs ONCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHLSX vs ONCFX
Fidelity Health Savings
Price$10.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.14M
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth I
Price$13.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.04B
FHLSX vs ONCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLSX vs. ONCFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLSX is a StrongBuy and ONCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONCFX has more cash in the bank: 4.04B vs. FHLSX (64.1M). ONCFX pays higher dividends than FHLSX: ONCFX (3.53) vs FHLSX (2.73). FHLSX was incepted earlier than ONCFX: FHLSX (5 years) vs ONCFX (29 years). ONCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FHLSX (0.49). FHLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ONCFX (8.00). FHLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONCFX: FHLSX (0) vs ONCFX (1000000). FHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. ONCFX (7.25). FHLSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.38 vs. ONCFX (14.86).
| FHLSX | ONCFX | FHLSX / ONCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.69 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.69 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.956 | 6.177 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000000 | - |
| Net Assets | 64.1M | 4.04B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 3.53 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 7.25 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.81 | 16.36 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.38 | 14.86 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement