FHN
Price
$22.70
Change
-$0.13 (-0.57%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.53B
48 days until earnings call
TECTP
Price
$10.76
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHN vs TECTP

Header iconFHN vs TECTP Comparison
Open Charts FHN vs TECTPBanner chart's image
First Horizon
Price$22.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.57%)
Volume$44.25K
Capitalization11.53B
Tectonic Financial
Price$10.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
FHN vs TECTP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TECTP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHN vs. TECTP commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHN is a Buy and TECTP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FHN: $22.83 vs. TECTP: $10.75)
Brand notoriety: FHN and TECTP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHN: 189% vs. TECTP: 50%
Market capitalization -- FHN: $11.53B vs. TECTP: $0
FHN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.53B. TECTP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTECTP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TECTP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the long-term than TECTP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TECTP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TECTP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the short-term than TECTP.

Price Growth

FHN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.63% price change this week, while TECTP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHN is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHN YTD gains are higher at: 15.157 vs. TECTP (11.979).
FHNTECTPFHN / TECTP
Capitalization11.5BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.15711.979127%
P/E Ratio14.65N/A-
Revenue3.1BN/A-
Total Cash915MN/A-
Total Debt1.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHN vs TECTP: Fundamental Ratings
FHN
TECTP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1587
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
9100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECTP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHN (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TECTP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHN’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TECTP (100) in the null industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TECTP’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TECTP (100) in the null industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew significantly faster than TECTP’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TECTP (52) in the null industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to TECTP’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TECTP (100) in the null industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TECTP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHNTECTP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
15%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TECTP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVDS11.660.03
+0.26%
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
KDRN23.360.04
+0.15%
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF
GSST50.620.01
+0.02%
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
BCLO50.10-0.03
-0.05%
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF
FGDL45.29-0.12
-0.26%
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

TECTP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TECTP has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TECTP jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TECTP
1D Price
Change %
TECTP100%
+0.47%
FHN - TECTP
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
FITBI - TECTP
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
WAL - TECTP
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
NRIM - TECTP
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
FLG - TECTP
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
More