Advertisement
FHNGY vs WCRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHNGY is a Hold and WCRS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FHNGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWCRS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FHNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WCRS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FHNGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WCRS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FHNGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WCRS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
FHNGY (@Department Stores) experienced а +6.34% price change this week, while WCRS (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.61%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Department Stores (+1.62% weekly)A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.
@Specialty Stores (+3.73% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| FHNGY | WCRS | FHNGY / WCRS | |
| Capitalization | 2.54B | 41M | 6,198% |
| EBITDA | 12.2B | 26M | 46,923% |
| Gain YTD | -13.710 | 34.426 | -40% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.68 | 3.88 | 353% |
| Revenue | 58.3B | 166M | 35,120% |
| Total Cash | 3.23B | 20.8M | 15,519% |
| Total Debt | 23.4B | 20.6M | 113,592% |
WCRS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FHNGY | WCRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 34% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
FHNGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FHNGY and WCRS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHNGY and WCRS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHNGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHNGY | 100% | +2.17% | ||
| WCRS - FHNGY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DUFRY - FHNGY | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| KIRK - FHNGY | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| ACVA - FHNGY | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BARK - FHNGY | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||
WCRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WCRS and FHNGY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WCRS and FHNGY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WCRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCRS | 100% | N/A | ||
| FHNGY - WCRS | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| WFAFY - WCRS | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| SIEVF - WCRS | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| USSJF - WCRS | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WFAFF - WCRS | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||