Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHUMX vs FSMAX
FHUMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FHUMX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes US SMID Institutional
Price$15.82
Change-$0.07 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.76M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
FHUMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHUMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHUMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. FHUMX (4.76M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FHUMX: FSMAX (0.44) vs FHUMX (0.09). FHUMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FHUMX (5 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FHUMX (6.45) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FHUMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHUMX: FSMAX (0) vs FHUMX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.16 vs. FHUMX (-1.70). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.51 vs. FHUMX (53.62).
| FHUMX | FSMAX | FHUMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.45 | 0.04 | 18,429% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.582 | 10.838 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.76M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.44 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.70 | 18.16 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.33 | 57.15 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.62 | 60.51 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.14 | - |