FHYDF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.03 (-8.11%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.11M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
XPNGF
Price
$11.92
Change
-$0.06 (-0.50%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
19.43B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHYDF vs XPNGF

Header iconFHYDF vs XPNGF Comparison
Open Charts FHYDF vs XPNGFBanner chart's image
First Hydrogen
Price$0.34
Change-$0.03 (-8.11%)
Volume$2.04K
Capitalization25.11M
XPeng
Price$11.92
Change-$0.06 (-0.50%)
Volume$146
Capitalization19.43B
FHYDF vs XPNGF Comparison Chart in %
FHYDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHYDF vs. XPNGF commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHYDF is a Hold and XPNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FHYDF: $0.34 vs. XPNGF: $11.92)
Brand notoriety: FHYDF and XPNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHYDF: 30% vs. XPNGF: 30%
Market capitalization -- FHYDF: $25.11M vs. XPNGF: $19.43B
FHYDF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $25.11M. XPNGF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $19.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.46T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHYDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXPNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FHYDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XPNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XPNGF is a better buy in the long-term than FHYDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHYDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPNGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHYDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XPNGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XPNGF is a better buy in the short-term than FHYDF.

Price Growth

FHYDF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -10.53% price change this week, while XPNGF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.03% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XPNGF($19.4B) has a higher market cap than FHYDF($25.1M). XPNGF YTD gains are higher at: 81.155 vs. FHYDF (34.974). FHYDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.93M vs. XPNGF (-3.92B). XPNGF has more cash in the bank: 33.9B vs. FHYDF (255K). FHYDF has less debt than XPNGF: FHYDF (3.65M) vs XPNGF (30.7B). XPNGF has higher revenues than FHYDF: XPNGF (60.3B) vs FHYDF (0).
FHYDFXPNGFFHYDF / XPNGF
Capitalization25.1M19.4B0%
EBITDA-3.93M-3.92B0%
Gain YTD34.97481.15543%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue060.3B-
Total Cash255K33.9B0%
Total Debt3.65M30.7B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHYDFXPNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHYDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABLD28.360.11
+0.38%
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
GHYG46.150.09
+0.20%
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bd ETF
KEMQ25.990.01
+0.04%
KraneShares Em Mkts Cnsmr Tech ETF
SHY83.08-0.01
-0.02%
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
MYI11.00-0.06
-0.54%
Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund III

FHYDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHYDF and VLVOF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHYDF and VLVOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHYDF
1D Price
Change %
FHYDF100%
-7.53%
VLVOF - FHYDF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVTV - FHYDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
PSNYW - FHYDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.08%
RIVN - FHYDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
XPNGF - FHYDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

XPNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XPNGF and DNFGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XPNGF and DNFGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPNGF
1D Price
Change %
XPNGF100%
N/A
DNFGF - XPNGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLLF - XPNGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPEV - XPNGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
RIVN - XPNGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
GGR - XPNGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.01%
More