FIBH
Price
$29.00
Change
+$0.97 (+3.46%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
16.67M
NMBF
Price
$14.85
Change
+$0.04 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FIBH vs NMBF

Header iconFIBH vs NMBF Comparison
Open Charts FIBH vs NMBFBanner chart's image
First Bancshares
Price$29.00
Change+$0.97 (+3.46%)
Volume$200
Capitalization16.67M
NMB Finl
Price$14.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
FIBH vs NMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIBH vs. NMBF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIBH is a Hold and NMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FIBH: $29.00 vs. NMBF: $15.50)
Brand notoriety: FIBH and NMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIBH: 54% vs. NMBF: 73%
Market capitalization -- FIBH: $16.67M vs. NMBF: $0
FIBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.67M. NMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIBH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FIBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMBF is a better buy in the long-term than FIBH.

Price Growth

FIBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIBH (14.408) and NMBF (13.748) have similar YTD gains .
FIBHNMBFFIBH / NMBF
Capitalization16.7MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.40813.748105%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FIBH vs NMBF: Fundamental Ratings
FIBH
NMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9148
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10030
SMR RATING
1..100
653
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIBH's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as NMBF (49). This means that FIBH’s stock grew similarly to NMBF’s over the last 12 months.

NMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIBH (100). This means that NMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

FIBH's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMBF (53). This means that FIBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMBF’s over the last 12 months.

FIBH's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as NMBF (44). This means that FIBH’s stock grew similarly to NMBF’s over the last 12 months.

NMBF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIBH (52). This means that NMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NYVTX26.180.30
+1.16%
Davis NY Venture A
DILYX14.880.14
+0.95%
Davis International Y
TVLYX12.03N/A
N/A
Touchstone Value Y
MXHAX12.41N/A
N/A
Empower Large Cap Value Inv II
PAHWX8.40N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps A

FIBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIBH and ITUB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIBH and ITUB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIBH
1D Price
Change %
FIBH100%
N/A
ITUB - FIBH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
FOTB - FIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
NMBF - FIBH
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.38%
FGFH - FIBH
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
FFWC - FIBH
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More

NMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMBF and BKFL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMBF and BKFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMBF
1D Price
Change %
NMBF100%
+4.38%
BKFL - NMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
CSHX - NMBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - NMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKSB - NMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYBJF - NMBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More