Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICDX vs TREMX
FICDX vs TREMX Comparison
Open Charts FICDX vs TREMX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Europe
Price$6.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.38M
FICDX vs TREMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICDX vs. TREMX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICDX is a StrongBuy and TREMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICDX has more cash in the bank: 997M vs. TREMX (57.4M). FICDX pays higher dividends than TREMX: FICDX (1.14) vs TREMX (0.59). FICDX was incepted earlier than TREMX: FICDX (38 years) vs TREMX (25 years). TREMX (2.85) is less costly to investors than FICDX (1.03). TREMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.40 vs. FICDX (8.00). FICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TREMX: FICDX (0) vs TREMX (2500). TREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.61 vs. FICDX (10.60). FICDX return over 5 years is better than : 61.05 vs. TREMX (-46.75).
| FICDX | TREMX | FICDX / TREMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.41 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 2.85 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.829 | 26.806 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 997M | 57.4M | 1,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.59 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | 24.61 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.09 | 203.41 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.05 | -46.75 | -131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.36 | -34.27 | -226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement