Ad is loading...
FICHX vs RGAFX
FICHX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGAFX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$13.28
Change+$0.14 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets480.81M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$76.94
Change+$0.87 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.54B
FICHX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. FICHX (481M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FICHX: RGAFX (0.73) vs FICHX (0.35). FICHX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FICHX (12 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAFX (31.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FICHX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.66 vs. FICHX (21.06). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.52 vs. FICHX (3.91).
| FICHX | RGAFX | FICHX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.588 | 3.386 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 481M | 307B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.73 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.06 | 22.66 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.05 | 13.48 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.91 | 47.52 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.75 | 86.49 | 17% |