Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs FRBAX
FIDAX vs FRBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs FRBAX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.12
Change-$0.30 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.92M
JHancock Regional Bank A
Price$30.64
Change-$0.38 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets867.78M
FIDAX vs FRBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. FRBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and FRBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBAX has more cash in the bank: 868M vs. FIDAX (300M). FRBAX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: FRBAX (1.60) vs FIDAX (1.07). FIDAX was incepted earlier than FRBAX: FIDAX (30 years) vs FRBAX (34 years). FIDAX (1.28) and FRBAX (1.27) have similar cost to investors . FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FRBAX (3.00). FIDAX (5%) and FRBAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FIDAX (1000) and FRBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. FIDAX (7.93). FRBAX return over 5 years is better than : 72.88 vs. FIDAX (20.75).
| FIDAX | FRBAX | FIDAX / FRBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.26 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.27 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.869 | 8.306 | 71% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 868M | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.60 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.93 | 10.03 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.35 | 15.42 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.75 | 72.88 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.96 | 77.88 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement