Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs FRBCX
FIDAX vs FRBCX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs FRBCX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.79M
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$28.77
Change-$0.07 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets857.9M
FIDAX vs FRBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. FRBCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and FRBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 858M vs. FIDAX (302M). FRBCX (1.10) and FIDAX (1.10) have matching dividends . FIDAX was incepted earlier than FRBCX: FIDAX (29 years) vs FRBCX (27 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FIDAX (1000) and FRBCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.33 vs. FRBCX (7.21). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 70.32 vs. FIDAX (20.06).
| FIDAX | FRBCX | FIDAX / FRBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.96 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.97 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.977 | 8.442 | 83% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302M | 858M | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.10 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.33 | 7.21 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.85 | 9.75 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.06 | 70.32 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.73 | 68.37 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement