Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.12
Change-$0.30 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.71M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$44.92
Change-$0.29 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.91M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 305M vs. RMBNX (226M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.07) vs RMBNX (0.67). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. FIDAX (9.62). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 77.53 vs. FIDAX (22.65).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.530 | 5.188 | 145% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 226M | 135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.67 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.62 | 12.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.24 | 6.01 | 370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.65 | 77.53 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.86 | 61.30 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement