Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.80
Change+$0.24 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.13M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$39.94
Change+$0.88 (+2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.78M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. RMBNX (199M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.11) vs RMBNX (0.75). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. FIDAX (13.79). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.33 vs. FIDAX (15.00).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.769 | -9.121 | -30% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 199M | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.75 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 16.25 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.97 | -14.25 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | 46.33 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.09 | 46.44 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement