Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.83M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.60
Change+$0.25 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.81M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 282M vs. RMBNX (210M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.11) vs RMBNX (0.70). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBNX (21 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.57 vs. FIDAX (-9.97). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 31.60 vs. FIDAX (4.05).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.717 | -1.466 | -117% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 282M | 210M | 134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.70 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.97 | -7.57 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.22 | -7.25 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.05 | 31.60 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.28 | 35.91 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers