Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.25
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.68M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.70
Change-$0.80 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.04M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a StrongBuy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 309M vs. RMBNX (218M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.08) vs RMBNX (0.73). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. RMBNX (7.87). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 85.55 vs. FIDAX (25.76).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.811 | 1.210 | 563% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 218M | 142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.73 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.31 | 7.87 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.98 | -0.41 | -5,062% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.76 | 85.55 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.61 | 54.88 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement