Ad is loading...
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.04
Change+$0.34 (+1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets410.34M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$43.34
Change+$0.53 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.56M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Mar 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 410M vs. RMBNX (196M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.62) vs RMBNX (0.85). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMBNX (49.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.41 vs. FIDAX (18.01). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.60 vs. FIDAX (14.98).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.544 | -0.396 | -896% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 410M | 196M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.85 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.01 | 25.41 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.71 | -13.80 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.98 | 37.60 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.08 | 69.88 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...