Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.92
Change+$0.23 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.67M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$41.11
Change+$0.93 (+2.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.85M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a StrongBuy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 300M vs. RMBNX (202M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.11) vs RMBNX (0.75). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.06 vs. FIDAX (15.00). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 81.50 vs. FIDAX (28.90).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.488 | -6.515 | -54% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 202M | 149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.75 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.00 | 19.06 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.40 | -4.99 | -388% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.90 | 81.50 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.03 | 45.08 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers