Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBNX
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.99M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$43.06
Change-$0.18 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.94M
FIDAX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBNX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 301M vs. RMBNX (217M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDAX (1.10) vs RMBNX (0.72). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.58 vs. FIDAX (11.71). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 70.25 vs. FIDAX (19.01).
| FIDAX | RMBNX | FIDAX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.14 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.14 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.537 | 0.605 | 915% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 217M | 139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.72 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.71 | 13.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.89 | -8.12 | -134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.01 | 70.25 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.32 | 49.66 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement