Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs HSSAX
FIDCX vs HSSAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs HSSAX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$16.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.79M
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$32.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.26M
FIDCX vs HSSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. HSSAX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and HSSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 302M vs. HSSAX (51.3M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: FIDCX (0.52) vs HSSAX (0.00). FIDCX was incepted earlier than HSSAX: FIDCX (27 years) vs HSSAX (29 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than HSSAX (1.77). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. HSSAX (32.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: FIDCX (1000) vs HSSAX (2000). HSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.37 vs. FIDCX (6.32). HSSAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.55 vs. FIDCX (9.81).
| FIDCX | HSSAX | FIDCX / HSSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.77 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.77 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.366 | 15.722 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302M | 51.3M | 589% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 23.37 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.04 | 23.96 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.81 | 31.55 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.36 | 19.53 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement