Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs HSSCX
FIDCX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs HSSCX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$16.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.79M
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$26.24
Change+$0.11 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.26M
FIDCX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. HSSCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and HSSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 302M vs. HSSCX (51.3M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FIDCX (0.52) vs HSSCX (0.00). FIDCX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FIDCX (27 years) vs HSSCX (25 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. HSSCX (32.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FIDCX (1000) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.33 vs. FIDCX (5.83). HSSCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.63 vs. FIDCX (9.88).
| FIDCX | HSSCX | FIDCX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.43 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.43 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.432 | 15.313 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302M | 51.3M | 589% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 22.33 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.27 | 23.44 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.88 | 26.63 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.90 | 6.66 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement