Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBKX
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBKX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.19
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.57M
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.48 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.6M
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBKX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a StrongBuy and RMBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. RMBKX (198M). RMBKX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBKX (1.24) vs FIDCX (0.53). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBKX (1.39). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.98 vs. FIDCX (9.57). RMBKX return over 5 years is better than : 75.02 vs. FIDCX (10.13).
| FIDCX | RMBKX | FIDCX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.729 | -8.649 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 198M | 148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.24 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 17.98 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.67 | -1.27 | -1,153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.13 | 75.02 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.79 | 60.71 | -11% |