Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBKX
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBKX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.85
Change-$0.16 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.57M
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$49.72
Change-$0.71 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.22M
FIDCX vs RMBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBKX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a StrongBuy and RMBKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 309M vs. RMBKX (217M). RMBKX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBKX (1.21) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBKX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBKX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBKX (1.39). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. FIDCX (11.18). RMBKX return over 5 years is better than : 108.03 vs. FIDCX (18.49).
| FIDCX | RMBKX | FIDCX / RMBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.39 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.167 | 0.961 | 642% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 217M | 142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.21 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 17.74 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.53 | 8.14 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.49 | 108.03 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.88 | 70.95 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement