Ad is loading...
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.15
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.71M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$48.11
Change-$0.07 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.7M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBLX (205M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.51) vs FIDCX (0.56). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.13). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.47 vs. FIDCX (7.60). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 95.42 vs. FIDCX (18.36).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.13 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.13 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.265 | -5.770 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 205M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.51 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.60 | 16.47 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.23 | -2.35 | -307% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.36 | 95.42 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.44 | N/A | - |