Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.16M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$51.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.66M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a StrongBuy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 307M vs. RMBLX (217M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.42) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.07 vs. FIDCX (12.74). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 110.64 vs. FIDCX (17.75).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.504 | 0.782 | 704% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 217M | 141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.42 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 25.07 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.58 | 8.22 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.75 | 110.64 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers