Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.64
Change+$0.20 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.13M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$46.67
Change-$0.25 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.78M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. RMBLX (199M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.45) vs FIDCX (0.53). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. FIDCX (11.13). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 58.76 vs. FIDCX (5.22).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.387 | -8.234 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 199M | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.45 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.13 | 18.07 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.86 | -8.81 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.22 | 58.76 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement