Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.72
Change-$0.07 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.41M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$52.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.46M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. RMBLX (219M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.34) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.80 vs. FIDCX (2.43). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 75.06 vs. FIDCX (8.17).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.708 | 2.562 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 219M | 135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.34 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.43 | 11.80 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.54 | 10.27 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.17 | 75.06 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement