Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.42
Change-$0.10 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.24M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$48.46
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.55M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBLX (205M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.41) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.68 vs. RMBLX (9.95). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 77.91 vs. FIDCX (7.03).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.14 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.14 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.918 | -4.479 | -65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 205M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.41 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.68 | 9.95 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.61 | -3.72 | -258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | 77.91 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement