Ad is loading...
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$14.00
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets273.99M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$44.29
Change+$0.57 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.89M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. RMBLX (187M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.45) vs FIDCX (0.54). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.13). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMBLX (49.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. FIDCX (4.30). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 91.51 vs. FIDCX (13.16).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.13 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.13 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.626 | -13.378 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 187M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.45 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.30 | 16.73 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.11 | -15.31 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.16 | 91.51 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.56 | N/A | - |