Ad is loading...
FIDCX vs RMBLX
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$14.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets360.47M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$46.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.52M
FIDCX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBLX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 360M vs. RMBLX (192M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBLX (1.35) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.13). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMBLX (49.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. FIDCX (7.66). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 79.51 vs. FIDCX (16.60).
| FIDCX | RMBLX | FIDCX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.13 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.13 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.525 | -5.261 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 360M | 192M | 188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.35 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 18.74 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.36 | -13.84 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.60 | 79.51 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...