Ad is loading...
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$14.07
Change+$0.98 (+7.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.07M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$37.50
Change+$2.10 (+5.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.03M
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 257M vs. RMBNX (178M). RMBNX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBNX (0.74) vs FIDCX (0.54). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMBNX (49.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. FIDCX (-6.05). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 54.36 vs. FIDCX (2.39).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.12 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.12 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.196 | -17.636 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 178M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.74 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.05 | 3.01 | -201% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.41 | -23.46 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.39 | 54.36 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.33 | 34.30 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...