Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.88
Change-$0.25 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.71M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$44.92
Change-$0.29 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.91M
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 305M vs. RMBNX (226M). RMBNX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBNX (0.67) vs FIDCX (0.51). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (27 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. FIDCX (7.06). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 77.53 vs. FIDCX (12.29).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.14 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.14 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.963 | 5.188 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 226M | 135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.67 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 12.81 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.50 | 6.01 | 275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.29 | 77.53 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.90 | 61.30 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement