Ad is loading...
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.27
Change+$0.17 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$43.08
Change+$0.15 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 496M vs. RMBNX (176M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDCX (1.22) vs RMBNX (0.85). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMBNX (49.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.66 vs. RMBNX (15.33). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 17.17 vs. FIDCX (-8.62).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.837 | 15.511 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 496M | 176M | 282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.85 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.66 | 15.33 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.03 | -17.57 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.62 | 17.17 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.46 | 65.41 | -4% |