Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.64
Change+$0.20 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.13M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$39.94
Change+$0.88 (+2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.78M
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. RMBNX (199M). RMBNX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBNX (0.75) vs FIDCX (0.53). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. FIDCX (11.13). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.33 vs. FIDCX (5.22).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.14 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.14 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.387 | -9.121 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 199M | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.75 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.13 | 16.25 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.86 | -14.25 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.22 | 46.33 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.25 | 46.44 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement