Ad is loading...
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.87
Change+$0.28 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets410.34M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$43.34
Change+$0.53 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.56M
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Mar 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 410M vs. RMBNX (196M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDCX (1.22) vs RMBNX (0.85). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMBNX (49.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.41 vs. FIDCX (15.18). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.60 vs. FIDCX (5.20).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.382 | -0.396 | -855% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 410M | 196M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.85 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.18 | 25.41 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.14 | -13.80 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.20 | 37.60 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.08 | 69.88 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...