Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs RMBNX
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.71
Change-$0.17 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.5M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.61
Change-$0.45 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.12M
FIDCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. RMBNX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 302M vs. RMBNX (216M). RMBNX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: RMBNX (0.72) vs FIDCX (0.52). FIDCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDCX (26 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDCX (1.98). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDCX (61.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. FIDCX (8.25). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 69.55 vs. FIDCX (9.23).
| FIDCX | RMBNX | FIDCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.14 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.14 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.305 | 0.186 | 2,850% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302M | 216M | 140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.72 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.25 | 10.43 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.22 | -9.24 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.23 | 69.55 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.75 | 49.65 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement