Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs FSRBX
FIDSX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs FSRBX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.11
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$34.24
Change+$0.27 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.86M
FIDSX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. FSRBX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and FSRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. FSRBX (450M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FSRBX (1.98) vs FIDSX (1.32). FIDSX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: FIDSX (44 years) vs FSRBX (39 years). FSRBX (0.71) and FIDSX (0.69) have similar cost to investors . FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSRBX (31.00). FIDSX (0) and FSRBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.88 vs. FIDSX (14.96). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 129.87 vs. FIDSX (119.75).
| FIDSX | FSRBX | FIDSX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.71 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.71 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.275 | 10.250 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 450M | 238% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.98 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 21.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.60 | 43.19 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 119.75 | 129.87 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.25 | 51.53 | 222% |