Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.69
Change+$0.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.97
Change+$0.58 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.45M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. RMBNX (212M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.32) vs RMBNX (0.69). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. RMBNX (2.91). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 105.21 vs. RMBNX (61.24).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.242 | -1.373 | -309% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 212M | 505% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.69 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 2.91 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.30 | -2.16 | -2,513% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.21 | 61.24 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.33 | 45.97 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement