Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.07
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.61
Change-$0.45 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.12M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBNX (216M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.36) vs RMBNX (0.72). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.55 vs. RMBNX (10.43). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 111.09 vs. RMBNX (69.55).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.006 | 0.186 | 4,301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 216M | 506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.55 | 10.43 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.10 | -9.24 | -456% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.09 | 69.55 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.04 | 49.65 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement