Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.19
Change-$0.23 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$44.92
Change-$0.29 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.91M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. RMBNX (226M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.31) vs RMBNX (0.67). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.76 vs. RMBNX (12.81). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 114.92 vs. RMBNX (77.53).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.358 | 5.188 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 226M | 481% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.67 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.76 | 12.81 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.15 | 6.01 | 967% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.92 | 77.53 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.75 | 61.30 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement