Ad is loading...
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$13.93
Change+$1.04 (+8.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$37.50
Change+$2.10 (+5.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.03M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. RMBNX (178M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.53) vs RMBNX (0.74). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (43 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.72). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RMBNX (49.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. FIDSX (0.88). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 88.29 vs. RMBNX (54.36).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.12 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.12 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.548 | -17.636 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 178M | 584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.74 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.88 | 3.01 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.94 | -23.46 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.29 | 54.36 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.09 | 34.30 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...