Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RMBNX
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RMBNX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.49
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.60
Change+$0.25 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.81M
FIDSX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RMBNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RMBNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. RMBNX (210M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FIDSX (1.37) vs RMBNX (0.70). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FIDSX (44 years) vs RMBNX (21 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FIDSX (0) vs RMBNX (2500). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.86 vs. RMBNX (-7.57). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 79.63 vs. RMBNX (31.60).
| FIDSX | RMBNX | FIDSX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.973 | -1.466 | -271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 210M | 478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.70 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.86 | -7.57 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.20 | -7.25 | -554% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.63 | 31.60 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.04 | 35.91 | 265% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers