FIEB
Price
$10.30
Change
+$0.10 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
10.23M
GVFF
Price
$7.21
Change
+$0.06 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.53M
Ad is loading...

FIEB vs GVFF

Header iconFIEB vs GVFF Comparison
Open Charts FIEB vs GVFFBanner chart's image
First IC
Price$10.30
Change+$0.10 (+0.98%)
Volume$5.24K
Capitalization10.23M
Greenville Federal Financial
Price$7.21
Change+$0.06 (+0.84%)
Volume$100
Capitalization11.53M
FIEB vs GVFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FIEB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GVFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIEB vs. GVFF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIEB is a Hold and GVFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FIEB: $10.30 vs. GVFF: $7.21)
Brand notoriety: FIEB and GVFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIEB: 292% vs. GVFF: 35%
Market capitalization -- FIEB: $10.23M vs. GVFF: $11.53M
FIEB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.23M. GVFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $11.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIEB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGVFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FIEB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GVFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FIEB is a better buy in the long-term than GVFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIEB’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GVFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIEB’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GVFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GVFF is a better buy in the short-term than FIEB.

Price Growth

FIEB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.75% price change this week, while GVFF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

GVFF is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GVFF($11.5M) has a higher market cap than FIEB($10.2M). FIEB YTD gains are higher at: 10.753 vs. GVFF (0.874).
FIEBGVFFFIEB / GVFF
Capitalization10.2M11.5M89%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.7530.8741,230%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A5.1M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A24.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FIEB vs GVFF: Fundamental Ratings
FIEB
GVFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
3490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3546
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIEB's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as GVFF (32). This means that FIEB’s stock grew similarly to GVFF’s over the last 12 months.

FIEB's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GVFF (100). This means that FIEB’s stock grew significantly faster than GVFF’s over the last 12 months.

FIEB's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVFF (90). This means that FIEB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVFF’s over the last 12 months.

FIEB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GVFF (51). This means that FIEB’s stock grew similarly to GVFF’s over the last 12 months.

FIEB's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GVFF (46). This means that FIEB’s stock grew similarly to GVFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIEBGVFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
28%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FIEB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GVFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCTSX47.490.41
+0.87%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq Svc
RMFEX56.110.29
+0.52%
American Funds American Mutual R4
HWCIX29.730.15
+0.51%
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
VVSCX13.130.06
+0.46%
VALIC Company I Small Cap Value
RTXCX12.280.03
+0.24%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets C

FIEB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIEB and INFT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIEB and INFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIEB
1D Price
Change %
FIEB100%
N/A
INFT - FIEB
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBCYB - FIEB
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
MTRBF - FIEB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GVFF - FIEB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIZN - FIEB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GVFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GVFF and BKHYY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GVFF and BKHYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GVFF
1D Price
Change %
GVFF100%
N/A
BKHYY - GVFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IROQ - GVFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
CZNC - GVFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
BNCC - GVFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
TYCB - GVFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More