FIHL
Price
$16.10
Change
-$1.01 (-5.90%)
Updated
Aug 15, 01:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.79B
SLF
Price
$58.28
Change
+$0.22 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 15, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.74B
82 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FIHL vs SLF

Header iconFIHL vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts FIHL vs SLFBanner chart's image
Fidelis Insurance Holdings
Price$16.10
Change-$1.01 (-5.90%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.79B
Sun Life Financial
Price$58.28
Change+$0.22 (+0.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization32.74B
FIHL vs SLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIHL vs. SLF commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIHL is a Hold and SLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FIHL: $17.11 vs. SLF: $58.06)
Brand notoriety: FIHL and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIHL: 129% vs. SLF: 56%
Market capitalization -- FIHL: $1.79B vs. SLF: $32.74B
FIHL [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $1.79B. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $32.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIHL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FIHL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the long-term than FIHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIHL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIHL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the short-term than FIHL.

Price Growth

FIHL (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +4.33% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -5.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+2.29% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLF($32.7B) has a higher market cap than FIHL($1.79B). FIHL has higher P/E ratio than SLF: FIHL (17.52) vs SLF (14.18). SLF YTD gains are higher at: -2.157 vs. FIHL (-4.385). FIHL has less debt than SLF: FIHL (449M) vs SLF (6.38B). SLF has higher revenues than FIHL: SLF (33B) vs FIHL (2.55B).
FIHLSLFFIHL / SLF
Capitalization1.79B32.7B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.385-2.157203%
P/E Ratio17.5214.18124%
Revenue2.55B33B8%
Total CashN/A26.2B-
Total Debt449M6.38B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLF: Fundamental Ratings
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIHLSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBRL31.460.45
+1.45%
GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF
GSIB47.110.37
+0.80%
Themes Global Systemically Imp Bks ETF
HPI16.000.02
+0.13%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
KURE19.76-0.32
-1.59%
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF
BITX62.32-5.49
-8.10%
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF

FIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIHL has been loosely correlated with ACGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIHL jumps, then ACGL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIHL
1D Price
Change %
FIHL100%
-1.89%
ACGL - FIHL
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
ORI - FIHL
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
AEG - FIHL
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
AIG - FIHL
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
BNT - FIHL
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
+0.17%
HIG - SLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
ORI - SLF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
AEG - SLF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
BNT - SLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
AVVIY - SLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
More