Ad is loading...
FIJZX vs FSCPX
FIJZX vs FSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FIJZX vs FSCPX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret Z
Price$42.83
Change+$0.37 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets432.07M
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$54.46
Change+$0.47 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets468.29M
FIJZX vs FSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIJZX vs. FSCPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIJZX is a Buy and FSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 468M vs. FIJZX (432M). FSCPX pays higher dividends than FIJZX: FSCPX (0.07) vs FIJZX (0.00). FIJZX was incepted earlier than FSCPX: FIJZX (7 years) vs FSCPX (35 years). FSCPX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FIJZX (0.59). FSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FIJZX (25.00). FIJZX (0) and FSCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIJZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.15 vs. FSCPX (-6.31). FIJZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.34 vs. FSCPX (20.80).
| FIJZX | FSCPX | FIJZX / FSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.796 | -20.743 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 432M | 468M | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.15 | -6.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.42 | -3.36 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.34 | 20.80 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers