Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIJZX vs FSCPX
FIJZX vs FSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FIJZX vs FSCPX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret Z
Price$49.22
Change+$0.61 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.57M
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$62.57
Change+$0.78 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets483.97M
FIJZX vs FSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIJZX vs. FSCPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIJZX is a Buy and FSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX (484M) and FIJZX (480M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSCPX pays higher dividends than FIJZX: FSCPX (0.07) vs FIJZX (0.00). FIJZX was incepted earlier than FSCPX: FIJZX (7 years) vs FSCPX (35 years). FSCPX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FIJZX (0.59). FSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FIJZX (25.00). FIJZX (0) and FSCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIJZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.79 vs. FSCPX (2.48). FIJZX return over 5 years is better than : 38.02 vs. FSCPX (19.14).
| FIJZX | FSCPX | FIJZX / FSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.179 | -9.292 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 480M | 484M | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 2.48 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 27.54 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.02 | 19.14 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers