Ad is loading...
FIKAX vs FSTEX
FIKAX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. FSTEX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a Hold and FSTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. FSTEX (460M). FSTEX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: FSTEX (3.71) vs FIKAX (0.99). FIKAX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FIKAX (7 years) vs FSTEX (41 years). FSTEX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). FIKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSTEX (28.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FIKAX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FSTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.41 vs. FIKAX (-21.98). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 229.05 vs. FSTEX (214.54).
| FIKAX | FSTEX | FIKAX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.27 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.27 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.328 | -6.439 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 460M | 234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 3.71 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.98 | -13.41 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.98 | 12.19 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 229.05 | 214.54 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -5.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers