Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKAX vs HNRGX
FIKAX vs HNRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. HNRGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a StrongBuy and HNRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. HNRGX (15.2M). FIKAX pays higher dividends than HNRGX: FIKAX (1.03) vs HNRGX (0.08). FIKAX was incepted earlier than HNRGX: FIKAX (7 years) vs HNRGX (12 years). HNRGX (2.61) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). FIKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HNRGX (14.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNRGX: FIKAX (0) vs HNRGX (2500). HNRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.43 vs. FIKAX (-3.93). HNRGX return over 5 years is better than : 246.70 vs. FIKAX (202.32).
| FIKAX | HNRGX | FIKAX / HNRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.44 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.61 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.905 | 5.314 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 931M | 15.2M | 6,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.08 | 1,375% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.93 | 6.43 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.70 | 44.81 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 202.32 | 246.70 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement