Ad is loading...
FIKAX vs HNRGX
FIKAX vs HNRGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. HNRGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a Buy and HNRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. HNRGX (14.1M). FIKAX pays higher dividends than HNRGX: FIKAX (0.99) vs HNRGX (0.07). FIKAX was incepted earlier than HNRGX: FIKAX (7 years) vs HNRGX (11 years). HNRGX (2.42) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). FIKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HNRGX (14.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNRGX: FIKAX (0) vs HNRGX (2500). HNRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.30 vs. FIKAX (-18.23). HNRGX return over 5 years is better than : 276.05 vs. FIKAX (198.59).
| FIKAX | HNRGX | FIKAX / HNRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.27 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.42 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.826 | -7.135 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 14.1M | 7,624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.07 | 1,371% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.23 | -5.30 | 344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.75 | 10.47 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 198.59 | 276.05 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers