Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKAX vs HNRGX
FIKAX vs HNRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. HNRGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a Buy and HNRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. HNRGX (14.9M). FIKAX pays higher dividends than HNRGX: FIKAX (1.03) vs HNRGX (0.08). FIKAX was incepted earlier than HNRGX: FIKAX (7 years) vs HNRGX (12 years). HNRGX (2.61) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). FIKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HNRGX (14.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNRGX: FIKAX (0) vs HNRGX (2500). HNRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.84 vs. FIKAX (-4.38). HNRGX return over 5 years is better than : 224.52 vs. FIKAX (197.58).
| FIKAX | HNRGX | FIKAX / HNRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.44 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.61 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.583 | 4.013 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 931M | 14.9M | 6,248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.08 | 1,375% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.38 | 4.84 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.30 | 40.06 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 197.58 | 224.52 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement