Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKAX vs HNRGX
FIKAX vs HNRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. HNRGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a Hold and HNRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. HNRGX (13.3M). FIKAX pays higher dividends than HNRGX: FIKAX (0.97) vs HNRGX (0.07). FIKAX was incepted earlier than HNRGX: FIKAX (7 years) vs HNRGX (12 years). HNRGX (2.61) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). FIKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. HNRGX (14.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNRGX: FIKAX (0) vs HNRGX (2500). HNRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. FIKAX (5.42). FIKAX (227.59) and HNRGX (227.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FIKAX | HNRGX | FIKAX / HNRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.44 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.61 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.028 | 12.412 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 13.3M | 6,729% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.07 | 1,358% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 7.28 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.13 | 23.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 227.59 | 227.57 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement