Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKAX vs ICWIX
FIKAX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. ICWIX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. ICWIX (131M). ICWIX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: ICWIX (1.36) vs FIKAX (1.03). FIKAX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FIKAX (7 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). ICWIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FIKAX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.19 vs. FIKAX (-5.42). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 204.12 vs. ICWIX (167.35).
| FIKAX | ICWIX | FIKAX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.00 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.10 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.476 | 7.062 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 931M | 131M | 711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.42 | 10.19 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.90 | 52.05 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 204.12 | 167.35 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement