Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKBX vs RPFGX
FIKBX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FIKBX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Advisor Financials Z
Price$40.21
Change-$0.58 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708.73M
FIKBX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKBX vs. RPFGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKBX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. FIKBX (709M). FIKBX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FIKBX (1.39) vs RPFGX (1.29). FIKBX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FIKBX (7 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). RPFGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FIKBX (0.60). FIKBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FIKBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FIKBX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.90 vs. FIKBX (20.06). FIKBX return over 5 years is better than : 127.54 vs. RPFGX (108.48).
| FIKBX | RPFGX | FIKBX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.94 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.94 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.863 | 18.434 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 709M | 1.16B | 61% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.29 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.06 | 24.90 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.28 | 73.54 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 127.54 | 108.48 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement