Ad is loading...
FIKCX vs FSPHX
FIKCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. FIKCX (3.74B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FIKCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FIKCX (0.00). FIKCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FIKCX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSPHX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FIKCX (0.56). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FIKCX (37.00). FIKCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.80 vs. FIKCX (-11.95). FIKCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.25 vs. FSPHX (-10.01).
| FIKCX | FSPHX | FIKCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.65 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.65 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.848 | -7.083 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 6.42B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.95 | -10.80 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.71 | -7.54 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.25 | -10.01 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...