Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKCX vs FSPHX
FIKCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. FIKCX (3.3B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FIKCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FIKCX (0.00). FIKCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FIKCX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSPHX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FIKCX (0.56). FIKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FIKCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. FIKCX (-0.26). FIKCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.08 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| FIKCX | FSPHX | FIKCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.63 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.63 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.419 | 10.532 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 6.22B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.26 | 0.02 | -1,566% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.79 | 10.47 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.08 | -8.84 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement