Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKCX vs FSPHX
FIKCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKCX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. FIKCX (3.23B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FIKCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FIKCX (0.00). FIKCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FIKCX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSPHX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FIKCX (0.56). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FIKCX (37.00). FIKCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX (-15.13) and FIKCX (-15.70) have marching annual gain over last year. FIKCX return over 5 years is better than : -5.66 vs. FSPHX (-14.58).
| FIKCX | FSPHX | FIKCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.63 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.63 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.269 | -2.349 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 5.74B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.70 | -15.13 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.22 | -2.33 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.66 | -14.58 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers