Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKDX vs RMEBX
FIKDX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMEBX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$9.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.07M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
FIKDX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FIKDX (84.1M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FIKDX (2.03) vs RMEBX (1.05). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FIKDX (0.97). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMEBX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. FIKDX (-20.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.63 vs. FIKDX (16.66).
| FIKDX | RMEBX | FIKDX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.761 | 14.812 | -100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.1M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.05 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.30 | 7.29 | -278% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.79 | 43.24 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.66 | 59.63 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.46 | 92.37 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement