Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKDX vs RMEBX
FIKDX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMEBX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$12.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.81M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.53
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
FIKDX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FIKDX (89.8M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FIKDX (2.01) vs RMEBX (1.09). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FIKDX (0.97). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMEBX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. FIKDX (5.34). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. FIKDX (48.37).
| FIKDX | RMEBX | FIKDX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.07 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.095 | 12.681 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.8M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.09 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 6.63 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.19 | 33.39 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.37 | 57.72 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.21 | 94.26 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement