Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKDX vs RMFCX
FIKDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMFCX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$9.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.07M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
FIKDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FIKDX (84.1M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FIKDX (2.03) vs RMFCX (1.20). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FIKDX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMFCX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. FIKDX (-20.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.80 vs. FIKDX (16.66).
| FIKDX | RMFCX | FIKDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.91 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.761 | 14.964 | -99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.1M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.20 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.30 | 7.44 | -273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.79 | 43.84 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.66 | 60.80 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.46 | 94.21 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement