Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKDX vs RMFEX
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$12.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.81M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FIKDX (89.8M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FIKDX (2.01) vs RMFEX (1.49). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FIKDX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. FIKDX (5.34). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.31 vs. FIKDX (48.37).
| FIKDX | RMFEX | FIKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.095 | 13.050 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.8M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.49 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 7.10 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.19 | 35.20 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.37 | 61.31 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.21 | 103.92 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement