Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKDX vs RMFEX
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$12.29
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.69M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FIKDX (96.7M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FIKDX (2.10) vs RMFEX (1.53). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FIKDX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. FIKDX (4.44). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.33 vs. FIKDX (54.41).
| FIKDX | RMFEX | FIKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.159 | 9.748 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.7M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.53 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.44 | 11.81 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.90 | 30.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.41 | 64.33 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.74 | 86.20 | 51% |