Ad is loading...
FIKDX vs RMFEX
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$10.56
Change+$0.12 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.99M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.29
Change+$0.77 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.18B
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 97.2B vs. FIKDX (84M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FIKDX (2.25) vs RMFEX (1.61). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FIKDX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. FIKDX (-7.72). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.72 vs. FIKDX (37.88).
| FIKDX | RMFEX | FIKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.547 | -2.593 | 291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84M | 97.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 1.61 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.72 | 2.21 | -349% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.69 | 7.26 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.88 | 55.72 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.13 | 60.75 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...