Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKDX vs RMFEX
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$9.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.07M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FIKDX (84.1M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FIKDX (2.03) vs RMFEX (1.46). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FIKDX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. FIKDX (-20.30). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.30 vs. FIKDX (16.66).
| FIKDX | RMFEX | FIKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.761 | 15.212 | -97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.1M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.46 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.30 | 7.77 | -261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.79 | 45.19 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.66 | 63.30 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.46 | 101.97 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement