Ad is loading...
FIKDX vs RMFEX
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$11.16
Change+$0.12 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.11M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. FIKDX (87.1M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FIKDX (2.39) vs RMFEX (1.65). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FIKDX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. FIKDX (-4.51). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.56 vs. FIKDX (44.15).
| FIKDX | RMFEX | FIKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.344 | 1.374 | -243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.1M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 1.65 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.51 | 5.68 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.85 | 18.38 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.15 | 58.56 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.98 | 66.50 | 36% |