Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKIX vs FRUSX
FIKIX vs FRUSX Comparison
Open Charts FIKIX vs FRUSX
Fidelity Advisor Utilities Z
Price$51.11
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
FIKIX vs FRUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKIX vs. FRUSX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKIX is a Buy and FRUSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRUSX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. FIKIX (1.36B). FIKIX pays higher dividends than FRUSX: FIKIX (1.90) vs FRUSX (1.78). FIKIX was incepted earlier than FRUSX: FIKIX (7 years) vs FRUSX (30 years). FRUSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FIKIX (0.60). FIKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FRUSX (6.80). FIKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRUSX: FIKIX (0) vs FRUSX (1000). FIKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.83 vs. FRUSX (6.30). FIKIX return over 5 years is better than : 85.12 vs. FRUSX (39.05).
| FIKIX | FRUSX | FIKIX / FRUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.21 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.21 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.931 | 15.791 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 7.29B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.78 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.83 | 6.30 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.30 | 33.75 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.12 | 39.05 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers