Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKLX vs GRSRX
FIKLX vs GRSRX Comparison
Open Charts FIKLX vs GRSRX
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate Z
Price$10.50
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.94M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty R
Price$55.67
Change-$0.19 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
FIKLX vs GRSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKLX vs. GRSRX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKLX is a StrongBuy and GRSRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. FIKLX (340M). FIKLX pays higher dividends than GRSRX: FIKLX (4.37) vs GRSRX (2.24). FIKLX was incepted earlier than GRSRX: FIKLX (7 years) vs GRSRX (11 years). GRSRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FIKLX (0.77). FIKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. GRSRX (67.00). FIKLX (0) and GRSRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIKLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. GRSRX (-0.77). GRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. FIKLX (-1.50).
| FIKLX | GRSRX | FIKLX / GRSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.34 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.34 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.120 | 10.613 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340M | 2.06B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.37 | 2.24 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -0.77 | -776% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.63 | 17.51 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.50 | 26.47 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement