Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKOX vs MFBHX
FIKOX vs MFBHX Comparison
Open Charts FIKOX vs MFBHX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Z
Price$10.85
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
MFS Corporate Bond R3
Price$12.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63B
FIKOX vs MFBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKOX vs. MFBHX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKOX is a Hold and MFBHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFBHX has more cash in the bank: 4.63B vs. FIKOX (2.14B). MFBHX pays higher dividends than FIKOX: MFBHX (4.47) vs FIKOX (4.11). FIKOX was incepted earlier than MFBHX: FIKOX (7 years) vs MFBHX (21 years). MFBHX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FIKOX (0.40). MFBHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FIKOX (30.00). FIKOX (0) and MFBHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIKOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. MFBHX (5.42). FIKOX return over 5 years is better than : 1.37 vs. MFBHX (-3.36).
| FIKOX | MFBHX | FIKOX / MFBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.76 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.77 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.485 | 6.974 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 4.63B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.11 | 4.47 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 5.42 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.34 | 25.71 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.37 | -3.36 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement