Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKOX vs PBDAX
FIKOX vs PBDAX Comparison
Open Charts FIKOX vs PBDAX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Z
Price$10.85
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond A
Price$9.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.88B
FIKOX vs PBDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKOX vs. PBDAX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKOX is a Hold and PBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDAX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. FIKOX (2.14B). PBDAX (4.21) and FIKOX (4.11) have matching dividends . FIKOX was incepted earlier than PBDAX: FIKOX (7 years) vs PBDAX (21 years). PBDAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FIKOX (0.40). PBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. FIKOX (30.00). FIKOX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDAX: FIKOX (0) vs PBDAX (1000). PBDAX (6.01) and FIKOX (5.96) have marching annual gain over last year. FIKOX return over 5 years is better than : 1.37 vs. PBDAX (0.07).
| FIKOX | PBDAX | FIKOX / PBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.35 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.35 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.485 | 7.361 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 12.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.11 | 4.21 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 6.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.34 | 24.79 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.37 | 0.07 | 1,952% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement