Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKTX vs LALDX
FIKTX vs LALDX Comparison
Open Charts FIKTX vs LALDX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Z
Price$8.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.48B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.33B
FIKTX vs LALDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKTX vs. LALDX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKTX is a Hold and LALDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. FIKTX (2.48B). LALDX pays higher dividends than FIKTX: LALDX (5.01) vs FIKTX (4.20). FIKTX was incepted earlier than LALDX: FIKTX (7 years) vs LALDX (32 years). LALDX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FIKTX (0.25). LALDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FIKTX (68.00). FIKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LALDX: FIKTX (0) vs LALDX (1500). FIKTX (5.80) and LALDX (5.69) have marching annual gain over last year. LALDX return over 5 years is better than : 12.94 vs. FIKTX (8.90).
| FIKTX | LALDX | FIKTX / LALDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.58 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.58 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.391 | 2.124 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 42.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.20 | 5.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 5.69 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.74 | 13.79 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.90 | 12.94 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement