Ad is loading...
FIKWX vs HBLAX
FIKWX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FIKWX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Z
Price$11.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.53B
FIKWX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKWX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKWX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FIKWX (1.95B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FIKWX: HBLAX (3.37) vs FIKWX (3.07). FIKWX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FIKWX (7 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FIKWX (0.48). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FIKWX (22.00). FIKWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FIKWX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). FIKWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. HBLAX (4.03). FIKWX return over 5 years is better than : 19.79 vs. HBLAX (15.03).
| FIKWX | HBLAX | FIKWX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.89 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.89 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.001 | -0.042 | 2,363% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 11.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.37 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | 4.03 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.06 | 3.30 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.79 | 15.03 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers