Ad is loading...
FIKWX vs HBLCX
FIKWX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FIKWX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Z
Price$11.91
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.1B
FIKWX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKWX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKWX is a Buy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FIKWX (1.99B). FIKWX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FIKWX (2.82) vs HBLCX (2.65). FIKWX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FIKWX (6 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FIKWX (22.00). FIKWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FIKWX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). FIKWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. HBLCX (5.09). FIKWX return over 5 years is better than : 15.85 vs. HBLCX (4.44).
| FIKWX | HBLCX | FIKWX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.761 | 1.293 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 12.1B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 2.65 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 5.09 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.30 | -2.03 | -163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.85 | 4.44 | 357% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers