Ad is loading...
FIKWX vs HBLIX
FIKWX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FIKWX vs HBLIX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Z
Price$11.91
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Hartford Balanced Income I
Price$14.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.1B
FIKWX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKWX vs. HBLIX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKWX is a Buy and HBLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FIKWX (1.99B). HBLIX pays higher dividends than FIKWX: HBLIX (3.59) vs FIKWX (2.82). FIKWX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FIKWX (6 years) vs HBLIX (15 years). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FIKWX (22.00). FIKWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FIKWX (0) vs HBLIX (2000). FIKWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. HBLIX (6.30). FIKWX return over 5 years is better than : 15.85 vs. HBLIX (9.44).
| FIKWX | HBLIX | FIKWX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.761 | 1.410 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 12.1B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 3.59 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 6.30 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.30 | 1.16 | 285% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.85 | 9.44 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers