Advertisement
FIP vs NWPX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIP is a Hold and NWPX is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWPX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NWPX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWPX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NWPX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FIP (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -9.07% price change this week, while NWPX (@Steel) price change was -1.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIP is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
NWPX is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (-0.27% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Steel (+1.49% weekly)The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
| FIP | NWPX | FIP / NWPX | |
| Capitalization | 497M | 1.15B | 43% |
| EBITDA | 106M | 76.2M | 139% |
| Gain YTD | -7.549 | 91.439 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 28.15 | - |
| Revenue | 595M | 548M | 109% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 14.3M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.85B | 102M | 3,778% |
NWPX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FIP | NWPX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CFNCX | 105.49 | N/A | N/A |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs 529C | |||
| JSVAX | 32.76 | N/A | N/A |
| Janus Henderson Contrarian T | |||
| RMDCX | 2.76 | N/A | N/A |
| Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth C | |||
| LVFLX | 15.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R6 | |||
| BISMX | 26.21 | -0.32 | -1.21% |
| Brandes International Small Cap Equity I | |||
FIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIP has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIP jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIP | 100% | -6.03% | ||
| MLI - FIP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| BBUC - FIP | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| IIIN - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| MATW - FIP | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| NWPX - FIP | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||
NWPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWPX has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWPX jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWPX | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| ESAB - NWPX | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| PRLB - NWPX | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
| CMC - NWPX | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| MATW - NWPX | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| CRS - NWPX | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||