Advertisement
NWPX vs PRLB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWPX is a Buy and PRLB is a Buy.
NWPX | PRLB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWPX's Valuation (86) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as PRLB (89) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that NWPX’s stock grew similarly to PRLB’s over the last 12 months.
NWPX's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRLB (79) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that NWPX’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRLB’s over the last 12 months.
NWPX's SMR Rating (63) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as PRLB (84) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that NWPX’s stock grew similarly to PRLB’s over the last 12 months.
PRLB's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NWPX (43) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that PRLB’s stock grew similarly to NWPX’s over the last 12 months.
NWPX's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as PRLB (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that NWPX’s stock grew similarly to PRLB’s over the last 12 months.
| NWPX | PRLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NWPX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PRLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NWPX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PRLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NWPX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRLB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NWPX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PRLB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NWPX (@Steel) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while PRLB (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +1.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
NWPX is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
PRLB is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Steel (-0.61% weekly)The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
@Metal Fabrication (+0.64% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
NWPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWPX has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWPX jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWPX | 100% | +1.69% | ||
| ESAB - NWPX | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| PRLB - NWPX | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CMC - NWPX | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| MATW - NWPX | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.18% | ||
| CRS - NWPX | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
More | ||||
PRLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRLB has been loosely correlated with CODI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRLB jumps, then CODI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRLB | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| CODI - PRLB | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| NWPX - PRLB | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| CMC - PRLB | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| ATI - PRLB | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| ESAB - PRLB | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||