FIP vs TRC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIP is a Hold and TRC is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TRC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
| FIP | TRC | FIP / TRC | |
| Capitalization | 652M | 413M | 158% |
| EBITDA | 23.3M | 1.11M | 2,105% |
| Gain YTD | 149.480 | 0.640 | 23,374% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 128.00 | - |
| Revenue | 320M | 44.7M | 716% |
| Total Cash | 29.4M | 64.5M | 46% |
| Total Debt | 1.41B | 47.9M | 2,946% |
TRC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FIP | TRC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 45% |
FIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIP has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIP jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIP | 100% | +6.56% | ||
| MLI - FIP | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| TRC - FIP | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| IIIN - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| CODI - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| NWPX - FIP | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.21% | ||
More | ||||
TRC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRC has been loosely correlated with MDU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRC jumps, then MDU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRC | 100% | +2.85% | ||
| MDU - TRC | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| IIIN - TRC | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| CODI - TRC | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| MATW - TRC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| TUSK - TRC | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||