Ad is loading...
FIQFX vs MMCFX
FIQFX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MMCFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$40.51
Change+$0.12 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
AMG Veritas China N
Price$14.76
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.75M
FIQFX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MMCFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. MMCFX (41.8M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: FIQFX (1.58) vs MMCFX (1.26). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FIQFX (0) vs MMCFX (2000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. MMCFX (3.21). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.46 vs. MMCFX (-52.64).
| FIQFX | MMCFX | FIQFX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.14 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.48 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.112 | 9.252 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 41.8M | 2,624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.26 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 3.21 | 438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.31 | -7.75 | -443% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.46 | -52.64 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -65.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...