Ad is loading...
FIQFX vs RBCRX
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$34.19
Change-$1.28 (-3.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$8.40
Change-$0.68 (-7.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.73M
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. RBCRX (4.73M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: RBCRX (1.77) vs FIQFX (1.51). FIQFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FIQFX (7 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FIQFX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.67 vs. FIQFX (11.56).
| FIQFX | RBCRX | FIQFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 6.88 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.048 | 6.824 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 4.73M | 24,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.77 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.56 | 15.67 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.60 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.91 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -8.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers