Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs RBCRX
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$42.27
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$9.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12M
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. RBCRX (5.12M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: RBCRX (1.84) vs FIQFX (1.50). FIQFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FIQFX (7 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FIQFX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. RBCRX (13.87).
| FIQFX | RBCRX | FIQFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 6.88 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.497 | 15.529 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 5.12M | 22,446% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 13.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.69 | -0.32 | -7,500% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.01 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement