Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs RBCRX
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$44.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$9.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21M
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. RBCRX (5.21M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: RBCRX (1.84) vs FIQFX (1.50). FIQFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FIQFX (7 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FIQFX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.58 vs. RBCRX (19.50).
| FIQFX | RBCRX | FIQFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 6.88 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.738 | 17.529 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 5.21M | 22,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.58 | 19.50 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.99 | -0.81 | -3,468% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.84 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement