Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQGX vs RNWBX
FIQGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FIQGX vs RNWBX
Fidelity Advisor Emerg Mkts Discv Z
Price$19.18
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.61
Change+$0.45 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.72B
FIQGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73.7B vs. FIQGX (1.23B). FIQGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FIQGX (3.33) vs RNWBX (0.13). FIQGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FIQGX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FIQGX (0.89). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FIQGX (29.00). FIQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FIQGX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FIQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. RNWBX (15.12). FIQGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.14 vs. RNWBX (23.93).
| FIQGX | RNWBX | FIQGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.67 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.67 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.443 | 21.224 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 73.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 0.13 | 2,657% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.40 | 15.12 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.88 | 45.18 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.14 | 23.93 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement