Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQPX vs IASMX
FIQPX vs IASMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs IASMX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$67.94
Change+$0.19 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets563.68M
Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus
Price$20.42
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92M
FIQPX vs IASMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQPX vs. IASMX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQPX is a Hold and IASMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQPX has more cash in the bank: 564M vs. IASMX (11.9M). IASMX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: IASMX (0.35) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than IASMX: FIQPX (7 years) vs IASMX (29 years). IASMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than FIQPX (0.81). FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. IASMX (6.18). FIQPX has a lower initial minimum investment than IASMX: FIQPX (0) vs IASMX (5000). FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.71 vs. IASMX (22.76). FIQPX return over 5 years is better than : 15.98 vs. IASMX (-3.70).
| FIQPX | IASMX | FIQPX / IASMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.99 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 2.50 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.118 | 33.902 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 564M | 11.9M | 4,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.71 | 22.76 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.34 | 54.91 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.98 | -3.70 | -432% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement