Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQPX vs PNSIX
FIQPX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs PNSIX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$63.15
Change+$0.87 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.52M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$19.61
Change+$0.42 (+2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
FIQPX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQPX vs. PNSIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQPX is a Buy and PNSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 1.97B vs. FIQPX (521M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: PNSIX (1.10) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: FIQPX (7 years) vs PNSIX (10 years). PNSIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FIQPX (0.81). FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PNSIX (54.80). FIQPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: FIQPX (0) vs PNSIX (500000). FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.68 vs. PNSIX (19.19). FIQPX return over 5 years is better than : 12.79 vs. PNSIX (-5.79).
| FIQPX | PNSIX | FIQPX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.83 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.86 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.611 | 16.377 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 1.97B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.68 | 19.19 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.14 | 23.40 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.79 | -5.79 | -221% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement