Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQPX vs PNSIX
FIQPX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs PNSIX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$53.71
Change-$0.18 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.6M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$17.63
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
FIQPX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQPX vs. PNSIX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQPX is a Buy and PNSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. FIQPX (437M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: PNSIX (1.26) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: FIQPX (7 years) vs PNSIX (9 years). PNSIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FIQPX (0.81). FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PNSIX (54.80). FIQPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: FIQPX (0) vs PNSIX (500000). FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.09 vs. PNSIX (7.26). FIQPX return over 5 years is better than : 30.11 vs. PNSIX (7.43).
| FIQPX | PNSIX | FIQPX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.83 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.86 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.555 | 5.999 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 1.84B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.09 | 7.26 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.52 | 10.84 | 475% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.11 | 7.43 | 405% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement