Ad is loading...
FIQPX vs PRASX
FIQPX vs PRASX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs PRASX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$47.90
Change+$1.40 (+3.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.26M
T. Rowe Price New Asia
Price$16.02
Change+$0.43 (+2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FIQPX vs PRASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQPX vs. PRASX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQPX is a Hold and PRASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRASX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. FIQPX (437M). PRASX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: PRASX (1.03) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than PRASX: FIQPX (7 years) vs PRASX (35 years). PRASX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FIQPX (0.81). FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PRASX (54.80). FIQPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRASX: FIQPX (0) vs PRASX (2500). FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. PRASX (-2.78). FIQPX return over 5 years is better than : 21.37 vs. PRASX (-3.50).
| FIQPX | PRASX | FIQPX / PRASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.03 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.03 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.469 | -6.870 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 1.65B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | -2.78 | -271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.58 | -8.40 | -233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.37 | -3.50 | -611% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -6.41 | - |