Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQPX vs TRZNX
FIQPX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs TRZNX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$63.15
Change+$0.87 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.52M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$19.58
Change+$0.43 (+2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
FIQPX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.97B vs. FIQPX (521M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: TRZNX (1.98) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: FIQPX (7 years) vs TRZNX (5 years). TRZNX (0.83) and FIQPX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. TRZNX (54.80). FIQPX (0) and TRZNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.68 vs. TRZNX (20.19).
| FIQPX | TRZNX | FIQPX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.83 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.611 | 17.050 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 1.97B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.98 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.68 | 20.19 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.14 | 26.46 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.79 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement