Ad is loading...
FIQPX vs TRZNX
FIQPX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs TRZNX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$47.90
Change+$1.40 (+3.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.26M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$15.87
Change+$0.42 (+2.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FIQPX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. FIQPX (437M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: TRZNX (2.26) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: FIQPX (7 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). TRZNX (0.83) and FIQPX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. TRZNX (54.80). FIQPX (0) and TRZNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. TRZNX (-1.75).
| FIQPX | TRZNX | FIQPX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.83 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.469 | -6.590 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 1.65B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | -1.75 | -430% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.58 | -5.52 | -355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.37 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...