Ad is loading...
FISGX vs PMBPX
FISGX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FISGX vs PMBPX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp I
Price$34.25
Change+$0.32 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.75M
FISGX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISGX vs. PMBPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISGX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. FISGX (147M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FISGX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FISGX (0.00). FISGX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FISGX (35 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). FISGX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.84). FISGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISGX: PMBPX (0) vs FISGX (100000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. FISGX (-8.25). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. FISGX (-3.96).
| FISGX | PMBPX | FISGX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.84 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.84 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.305 | -4.809 | 339% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 28.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.25 | 6.71 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.11 | 18.38 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.96 | 60.92 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.85 | 78.70 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...