Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISPX vs RWEBX
FISPX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts FISPX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index IS
Price$8.84
Change-$0.07 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.84M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.54
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
FISPX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISPX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISPX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. FISPX (256M). FISPX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: FISPX (0.81) vs RWEBX (0.76). FISPX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: FISPX (35 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FISPX (0.56). FISPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISPX: RWEBX (250) vs FISPX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.20 vs. FISPX (2.86). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. FISPX (-10.81).
| FISPX | RWEBX | FISPX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.06 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.06 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.413 | 7.797 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.76 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | 3.20 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | 26.70 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.81 | 39.61 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.51 | 66.23 | -57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement