Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISPX vs RWMFX
FISPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FISPX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index IS
Price$8.84
Change-$0.07 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.84M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.02
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
FISPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISPX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. FISPX (256M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FISPX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FISPX (0.81). FISPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FISPX (35 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FISPX (0.56) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FISPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISPX: RWMFX (250) vs FISPX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. FISPX (2.86). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.78 vs. FISPX (-10.81).
| FISPX | RWMFX | FISPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.31 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.413 | 8.527 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.41 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | 4.02 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | 29.47 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.81 | 43.78 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.51 | 72.15 | -52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement